The treaty is so central to this country’s national security, and the objections from Mr. Kyl — and apparently the whole Republican leadership — are so absurd that the only explanation is their limitless desire to deny President Obama any legislative success.
The Republicans like to claim that they are the party of national security. We can only hope that other senators in the party will decide that the nation’s security interests must trump political maneuvering.
The treaty, the first with Russia in a decade, calls for both sides to reduce their deployed warheads modestly to 1,550 from 2,200. More important, it would restore “verification,” inspections and other exchanges of information about the American and Russian arsenals.
(More here.)
You have read this article with the title NYT editorial: The Party of National Security?. You can bookmark this page URL http://ogbcommunity.blogspot.com/2010/11/nyt-editorial-party-of-national.html. Thanks!
No comment for "NYT editorial: The Party of National Security?"
Post a Comment