The more realistic question is "Just when does Diplomatic Immunity stop ?".
When I studied for my Law degree I remember quite distinctly there was the case of the "Sales Representative" who visited a customer company and who seduced a company employee there. He was subsequently prosecuted.
He pleaded not guilty saying he only went to the company as a sales representative on behalf of his employers.
The judge asked him: "What if you had killed her ? Would you then have expected me to hang your company by its company seal ?".
Is this not a simple example of how to decide where and when "Diplomatic Immunity" starts and finishes ? The lawyers behind DSK perhaps want to avoid a long drawn out legal battle, but they must have other convincing reasons to frustrate the plaintiff, Nafissatou Diallo.
You have read this article with the title DSK PLEADS "DIPLOMATIC IMMUNITY" !!! REALLY ?. You can bookmark this page URL http://ogbcommunity.blogspot.com/2012/03/dsk-pleads-immunity-really.html. Thanks!
No comment for "DSK PLEADS "DIPLOMATIC IMMUNITY" !!! REALLY ?"
Post a Comment